Treat people with the respect to which they're entitled and abandon this counter-productive sales pitch finangling. But: it is fair for me to run your gallery 'examples' through my own Photoshop CS and to report that it can't do with that picture what your Photo Retoucher 3.2 is claimed to have done.Ĭome on then, SoftOrbits. Like John, I too use Adobe Photoshop CS and, also like him, I guess, believe it would be absurd as well as unfair to even think of comparing an Adobe product costing over $600 with SoftOrbits' product costing at least $550 less.
Or even, white.There's simply not enough data available to the software for it to run proximity substitution of the kind demonstrated here.
It had absolutely no way of 'knowing' that the window's sill, obscured by that quartet of figures, was the same color as the window's upper frame. Sadly though, Photo Retoucher 3.2 is not psychic.
John's earlier post high-lighted an oddity in the seeming addition rather than removal, of a man in the image foreground my own bewilderment arises from the purported deletion of the quartet of figures in the right background, not so much an example of Photo Retoucher 3.2's mastery of pixel manipulation as evidence of psychic powers so astonishing in any software that I think I'll make a bid to buy your entire company, never mind this individual product.
I know they're intended to show prospective purchasers how good this SoftOrbits software is, but in truth, all they're really doing is inducing broad grins at the sheer ineptitude of the presentation. do yourself a favor and quit with the silly 'before and after' pictures you put on your website.